Share prlwctd's profile
 
Facebook Twitter
 
 
prlwctd
 
 
 
prlwctd's stats
 
  • Review count
    184
  • Helpfulness votes
    119
  • First review
    October 10, 2007
  • Last review
    July 31, 2009
  • Featured reviews
    0
  • Average rating
    4.1
 
Reviews comments
  • Review comment count
    0
  • Helpfulness votes
    0
  • First review comment
    None
  • Last review comment
    None
  • Featured review comments
    0
 
Questions
  • Question count
    0
  • Helpfulness votes
    0
  • First question
    None
  • Last question
    None
  • Featured questions
    0
 
Answers
  • Answer count
    0
  • Helpfulness votes
    0
  • First answer
    None
  • Last answer
    None
  • Featured answers
    0
  • Best answers
    0
 
 
prlwctd's Reviews
<< 1 ... 15 16 17 18 19 >>
 
  • Tech Insider Network
Customer Rating
4 out of 5
4
Brilliant and controversial
on October 31, 2008
Posted by: prlwctd
Blade Runner (in its various cuts) has richly deserved its controversy and its place in cinema history.
Sir Ridley Scott's followup to Alien is a complex story involving a sullen detective who's been ordered to terminate renegade androids who have made their way to Earth.
The eye-popping art direction and the catchy music are noteworthy. However, the downbeat tone and pacing turned some people off upon the film's original 1982 release. This was due to the casting of Harrison Ford in the leading role. He had just scored with Raiders of the Lost Ark (& The Empire Strikes Back before that), so people were expecting Blade Runner to be similar to Raiders in its tone. The advertising for the film enforced this perception as well, and the studio insisted on putting in forced narration by Ford (to the chagrin of both the actor & director). As a result, the film didn't last long at the box office, but, fortunately, the home video market was just coming into being. This led to the movie being rediscovered and, hence, gaining its well-deserved cult audience. This eventually led Sir Ridley to put out his delightful final cut of the movie for its silver anniversary, which, among other things, removes Ford's narration and changes the ending.
Whatever cut you prefer, Blade Runner will always be noted in the annals of film history, which is the finest compliment any film can be given.
What's great about it: the production values, the acting
What's not so great: the pacing is not for all tastes
I would recommend this to a friend!
0points
0of 0voted this as helpful.
 
  • Tech Insider Network
Customer Rating
4 out of 5
4
delightfully spooky
on October 31, 2008
Posted by: prlwctd
Released the same year as Alien, Phantasm has also become a classic.
A boy named Mike becomes suspicious of wrongdoings at the nearby cemetery after the death of his pal Tommy. With the help of his older brother Jody & their pal Reggie, Mike discovers that Tommy's body has been taken (along with others laid to rest there) by an alien known only as the Tall Man who, with a killer sphere and his ability to transform into a beautiful woman, takes bodies back to his world where he reanimated them as slaves (which look like Jawas but sound like the Tasmanian Devil).
The climax is a bit confusing, but, thankfully, the final scene of the movie makes up for it.
Angus Scrimm's Tall Man rivals Lugosi's Dracula and Karloff's Frankenstein as one of the all time scary movie monsters.
The music is also appropriatly moody, rather like John Carpenter's music for both Halloween and The Fog.
Michael Baldwin, Bill Thornbury, and Reggie Bannister are also instantly likeable as Mike, Jody, & Reggie, respectively.
What's great about it: a scary villain and great music
What's not so great: a bit confusing at times
I would recommend this to a friend!
0points
1of 2voted this as helpful.
 
This excellent DVD release of Clint Eastwood's 1971 directorial debut Play Misty for Me will please newcomers and longtime fans alike. Loaded with DVD extras, the movie's print has been cleaned up and returned to its original aspect ratio with a good anamorphic widescreen transfer. Beautifully filmed on-location by master cinematographer Bruce Surtees, the movie also serves as a love letter to the rugged California coastal town of Carmel. The Dolby Digital 2.0 Mono audio track is excellent and the scenes set at the Monterey Jazz Festival are given new sonic life on this disc. There are numerous disc extras to select (though some of them are too slight to be worth mentioning), but by far the best is the hour-long look back at the making of the movie. Entitled "Play It Again: A Look Back at Play Misty for Me," it's full of interviews with Eastwood, female lead Jessica Walter (in an excellent, star-making performance), key producers, writers, and others. This documentary makes plain that Play Misty for Me set the stage for Eastwood's career as a talented, individualistic director who refuses to get sucked into Hollywood power games or pointless power trips. After this film, Eastwood continued to use little or no makeup for actors, naturalistic lighting, real locations over sets, rich jazz scores, and tight budgets. Made for well under a million dollars, Play Misty for Me was a big mainstream hit with general audiences that also earned praise from indie film godfather John Cassavetes. The DVD also features a too short featurette on Eastwood and famed action-suspense director Don Siegel. A mentor and collaborator, Siegel was even amusingly cast as a bartender, mainly so Eastwood could get help from him on the first couple of days of shooting (he ended up not needing any). Besides better-than-average production notes and movie stills, the disc also features a montage of potential poster art that ends with the finished product. As a side note, the disc also makes plain that Eastwood considers Fatal Attraction to be an uncredited remake of Play Misty for Me.
 
  • Tech Insider Network
Customer Rating
5 out of 5
5
A great directorial debut
on October 28, 2008
Posted by: prlwctd
Misty is up there with Citizen Kane, Duel, & Boyz N the Hood (the respective directorial debuts of Orson Welles, Steven Spielberg, & John Singleton) as one of the all-time great freshman directorial outings.
Eastwood was already a movie star before he fulfilled his life long ambition to direct with this movie. His skill behind the camera led to his (arguably) more-acclaimed second career as a film director.
However, his performance as the deejay who gets more than he bargained for when he embarks on what he believes is a casual relationship with a fan (played on a wonderfully scary note by Jessica Walter), who wants something much more from her interactions with him, is noteworthy because, while we may not quite agree with his attitude toward such issues, his character, Dave Garver, still wins our sympathy because he doesn't encourage his nemesis the way the male leads in the lesser films this classic inspired (such garbage as Fatal Attraction, Poison Ivy, The Crush, Swimfan, Basic Instinct, and The Hand That Rocks the Cradle) do.
Don Siegel, who directed Clint several times (not least of which in Dirty Harry) has a wonderful small role as a bartender.
What's great about it: Great acting, directing, and suspense
What's not so great: nothing I can think of
I would recommend this to a friend!
+3points
3of 3voted this as helpful.
 
  • Tech Insider Network
Customer Rating
2 out of 5
2
Routine but watchable
on October 27, 2008
Posted by: prlwctd
I was dreading this remake. While Zombie's first film, House of 1000 Corpses, was enjoyable, his 2nd, The Devil's Rejects, was not so much, maybe because it lacked the sharp sense of humor of Corpses. Hence, I expected his take on Halloween to be more of the same.
It was nice to see that I wasn't only partially right. When I heard that Zombie was going to have Michael's mom be a stripper, my first thought was "Oh, Lord." However, his wife, Sheri Moon, made her a very sympathetic woman. You really felt sorry for her when she sees her little boy go ballistic on the world.
Other pluses: A cleverly cast Danielle Harris as Annie (a la Annette O'Toole in Smallville) and a nice reconstruction of the famous Myers mask.
Sadly, these assets are outweighed by the fact that this remake does nothing Halloween (or rather, Halloween's imitators) didn't already do. For instance, I saw Ronnie's "She gotta nice dumper on her!" coming a mile away. I also disliked how Laurie, Annie, & Lynda basically curse each other incessantly when we first meet them (& they're friends?). I was also surprised that Malcolm McDowell was as wasted here as Christopher Lee was in the Star Wars prequels. I would've thought if anyone in this film would have the opportunity for scenery chewing.... Oh, well.
And Michael Myers being white trash? No, just no!
This is not deplorable, but it is also not on par with great remakes like The Thing, The Fly, and War of the Worlds.
What's great about it: a surprisingly sympathetic performance from Sheri Moon Zombie
What's not so great: Halloween Zombie-style, 'nuf said.
No, I would not recommend this to a friend.
0points
1of 2voted this as helpful.
 
After a rather lackluster release in 1999, William Shatner's directorial debut, Star Trek V: The Final Frontier comes to DVD once again, this time in an impressive, two-disc, collectors edition. The first disc features the film presented in a widescreen 1.85:1 anamorphic transfer that preserves the original theatrical aspect ratio. In addition, the English soundtrack has been rendered in both Dolby Digital 5.1 and Dolby Digital 2.0 with a dubbed French soundtrack available in Dolby Digital 2.0. Bonus features on the first disc include a feature-length audio commentary by Shatner and his daughter Liz Shatner, author of Captain's Log: William Shatner's Personal Account of the Making of Star Trek V: The Final Frontier, and text commentary by Michael Okuda and Denise Okuda, co-authors of The Star Trek Encyclopedia. The second disc is composed completely of supplemental features, including eleven featurettes, deleted scenes, theatrical trailers, and television spots.
 
  • Tech Insider Network
Customer Rating
1 out of 5
1
One word: AARRGGHH!!!!
on October 25, 2008
Posted by: prlwctd
This film prompts so many questions from the viewer, and, in this case, that's not a good thing.
Why did this clown who calls himself Spock's brother come out of left field?
Why does nothing work on the new Enterprise?
Why do Vulcans suddenly have the ability to project mass hullucinations for all to see?
Why is the great David Warner in such a wasted role here?
Why was Shatner's notorious ego given free reign here as writer and director?
Why, why, why?
What's great about it: we knew it couldn't get any worse
What's not so great: everything else
No, I would not recommend this to a friend.
0points
0of 0voted this as helpful.
 
Ben Affleck and Kate Beckinsale are war-torn lovers in director Michael Bay's epic reenactment of the 1941 tragedy Pearl Harbor. Buena Vista has done a great job on this 2.35:1 anamorphic widescreen transfer (spread over two DVDs). All aspects of this picture look great, including even colors, dark black levels, and natural-looking fleshtones. Aside of a small amount of edge enhancement during one scene, this is a fine-looking transfer that should please fans. The audio is presented in DTS 5.1 Surround, Dolby Digital 5.1 Surround in English and French, as well as an English 2.0 soundtrack produced for those listening with headphones. The Dolby 5.1 and DTS soundtracks are very full, featuring continuous use of surround sounds throughout the entire film. Bombs and explosions rocket around the viewer through most of the film's running time. All aspects of the dialogue, music, and effects are distortion-free. Also included on this disc are English subtitles. This two-disc Pearl Harbor set, while not jam-packed, includes a few well-produced extra features. Two documentaries, "Journey to the Screen: The Making of Pearl Harbor" and "Unsung Heroes of Pearl Harbor," are both extensive and very informative. The first documentary focuses on the making of the film, which includes interviews with stars Ben Affleck, Josh Hartnett, Kate Beckinsale, producer Jerry Bruckheimer, and most of the main crew. The second feature takes a look at the real Pearl Harbor and includes interviews with survivors from that awful day. The second documentary is easily the more impressive and moving of the two. Finally, there is a music video by Faith Hill for the hit song "There You'll Be," a short promo for National Geographic: Beyond the Movie -- Pearl Harbor, as well as a teaser and trailer for Pearl Harbor. This is a nice, if insubstantial, DVD edition of Pearl Harbor.
 
  • Tech Insider Network
Customer Rating
1 out of 5
1
a disgrace to those who served in WWII
on October 24, 2008
Posted by: prlwctd
Despite eye-popping work on the Pearl Harbor attack, this film feels more like Star Wars than Saving Private Ryan and, as a result, is disgraceful to those who served & died in WWII.
When our boring, wooden heroes take off in planes to combat the Japanese attackers, I'm surprised they didn't start to belt out the Star Wars theme the same way Peter Griffin did in "The Family Guy"'s Star Wars episode.
Instead of a poignant story of the 1941 fateful attack at the titular location, we are instead given a lamely written love triangle involving three uninteresting people. Why? Because apparently that's what teenagers want to see as we can't have any movie with Ben Affleck & Josh Hartnett get a R rating because it would turn away the all-important teenage demographic. God forbid, this movie should have the brutal honesty which has been a hallmark of great war films like Patton, Apocalypse Now, Platoon, Full Metal Jacket, Glory, Saving Private Ryan, Flags of Our Fathers, and Letters From Iwo Jima.
What's great about it: the SFX
What's not so great: everythingn else
No, I would not recommend this to a friend.
-7points
1of 9voted this as helpful.
 
After the back-to-back smashes of Jaws and Close Encounters of the Third Kind, Steven Spielberg tried his hand at comedy with this loud, chaotic wartime comedy. The end result has long been dismissed as the blackest mark on the director's record. This DVD edition from Universal will allow people to judge for themselves. The film, a restored director's cut clocking in at two hours and 26 minutes, looks great, presented in a widescreen format with a 2.35:1 aspect ratio. Spielberg expertly captured the tone and look of 1940s California, and this DVD lets viewers luxuriate in it; however, they can't relax for long, as the sound has been remixed to a ground-shaking Dolby Digital 5.1. Every crashing plane, roaring anti-aircraft gun, and collapsing house sounds as if it's happening next door. Where the disc really takes off is with the extras. First up is an encyclopedic documentary that runs 100 minutes and gives every detail of the film's making. There are loads of anecdotes (including John Wayne's and Charlton Heston's refusal to act in the film, seeing it as unpatriotic), Spielberg's own home movies, and some reflections on the end result by the film's creators, many of whom (such as Robert Zemeckis ) went on to great success. Also included is a collection of promotional artwork and selected reviews from critics (few of which are favorable). Additionally, there are deleted scenes, trailers, production photographs, and production notes. One feature that deserves mentioning, only for how odd it is, is titled "Comic Relief" -- a collection of production stills with (supposedly) humorous voice balloons drawn over them. It's certainly one feature they could have left out. Overall, fans of 1941 and Spielberg completists will want to have this in their libraries.
 
  • Tech Insider Network
Customer Rating
3 out of 5
3
Rare Spielberg misstep
on October 23, 2008
Posted by: prlwctd
1941, Spielberg's 5th fiilm, was quite anticipated upon its release in 1979. His first 2 films (Duel & The Sugarland Express) gave him critical acclaim and his following 2 (Jaws & Close Encounters of the Third Kind) said he was here to stay as a film director.
First, the good news: Spielberg assembled a dream cast, including the top-billed John Belushi and Dan Aykroyd, along with Robert Stack, Christopher Lee, Toshiro Mifune, Ned Beatty, and others. The art direction, music, and costumes also are well done.
Now, the bad news: Sadly, what kept the film from attaining the same classic status as Dr. Strangelove is the lack of one thing every comedy needs in order to be good: laughs. While the film has a chuckle or two (like Lee and Mifune speaking to each other solely in German and Japanese, respectively), there are no standout classic funny moments as there are in classic laughfests like A Shot in the Dark, What About Bob?, and the aforementioned Kubrick film.
Thankfully, the cast keeps the movie from becoming something even worse than an unfunny comedy-a painfully unfunny comedy. Hence, 1941 isn't as bad as, say, Nothing But Trouble, Tomcats, Bubble Boy, or Freddy Got Fingered. For that, it's certainly worth a look for the curious.
Happily, Spielberg's future attempts at comedy proved more successful (Catch Me If You Can & The Terminal).
What's great about it: great cast & great production values
What's not so great: zero laughs
I would recommend this to a friend!
-5points
0of 5voted this as helpful.
 
  • Tech Insider Network
Customer Rating
3 out of 5
3
The height and downfall
on October 22, 2008
Posted by: prlwctd
Although a smash in its first two seasons, Lois and Clark was, in some ways, reborn at the beginning of its third. Before Lois accepts Clark's marriage proposal, she reveals that she knows how super-unique he is. They eventually embark on a romantic relationship with all the trials and tribulations that come with it.
Almost midway through the season ("Ultra Woman") the two become engaged.
These episodes provided an engaging new direction for the series with Dean Cain and Teri Hatcher wonderfully playing off each other. It seemed as if the show would become the golden exception to the "Moonlighting" curse of having main characters get together.
However, this promising momentum came to a drastic halt when ABC televised what we were told was the wedding episode in February of 1996. The episode in question ("I Now Pronounce You...") became a bold-faced lie by the producers as it didn't end with a wedding between the title characters, but with Clark marrying a clone (yes, a clone) of Lois due to Lex Luthor's interference. To add insult to injury, the episode became the first of a Melrose Place-esque arc which would last an irksome 5 EPISODES, involving Lois getting amnesia, which prompts Luthor and then a unscrupulous psychiatrist to try to win her love.
This wasn't merely a case of a series going in a direction that most viewers disliked. This was a case of the show's loyal fans being deliberately lied to and toyed with for weeks on end. Not surprisingly, this arc led to many fans quitting their viewership of the show for good, despite a few watchable episodes at the third season's end and the characters REALLY getting married the following season, which, due to the drop in viewership, turned out to be its last.
If anything could be viewed as snatching defeat from the jaws of victory, it's the third season of Lois & Clark.
What's great about it: great new direction for the series
What's not so great: wrongheaded 'soap opera' story arc in the middle of the season
I would recommend this to a friend!
0points
0of 0voted this as helpful.
 
  • Tech Insider Network
Customer Rating
2 out of 5
2
A disappointing finale
on October 21, 2008
Posted by: prlwctd
Xena deservedly became a smash (even more so than the series that it spun off of, Hercules: The Legendary Journeys).
However, the show began to falter as it entered its final season, with the title character becoming more and more godlike (and, as a result, less and less human) and, even worse, her bond with her sidekick Gabrielle became minimized.
Perhaps, then, it shouldn't have been a complete surprise that the show's finale, while possessing a more epic scope than the finale for Hercules, is a letdown.
Yet another previosuly unmentioned chapter of Xena's past returns to haunt her. This time, it's a figure in Japan who, like Lao Ma in Chin, became smitten with Xena, who, still being a warlord at this point, allowed her ambition to overcome her morality.
Although the photography is first rate, this trip to Japa seems to come out of left field making the whole episode seem anticlimatic with the series itself (whereas both the respective finales for Star Trek: The Next Generation & Star Trek: Deep Space Nine had some prior buildup).
The ending of the episode is especially unsatisfying as most anyone who's already seen it knows.
What's great about it: good acting from the 2 leads, beautiful production values
What's not so great: anticlimatic series finale
No, I would not recommend this to a friend.
-1point
1of 3voted this as helpful.
 
  • Tech Insider Network
Customer Rating
5 out of 5
5
Price at his best
on October 20, 2008
Posted by: prlwctd
This film, while successful upon it original 1968 release, was relegated in US cinemas to midnight/drive-in screenings like Vincent Price's Edgar Allan Poe adaptations (indeed, its original US title was the somewhat-catchy "The Conqueror Worm," the title of a Poe poem).
Had the film received the same mainstream distribution as "Rosemary's Baby"(also released in 1968), it quite possibly could've led to an Oscar for Price for his brilliant, haunting portrayal of the title character.
Price's character, one Matthew Hopkins, travels the English countryside with his unscrupulous sidekick making money by torturing innocents suspected of witchcraft. One such individual, a kind priest, dies as a result of such action, which, in turn, incurs the wrath of his niece(whom Hopkins has designs on) and her lover, a soldier.
The film also gained some noteriety due to the drug-induced death of its director, Michael Reeves, following the completion of filming.
What's great about it: Great acting and directing, shocking scenes of brutality
What's not so great: not for the squeamish
I would recommend this to a friend!
+1point
1of 1voted this as helpful.
 
<< 1 ... 15 16 17 18 19 >>
 
prlwctd's Review Comments
 
prlwctd has not submitted comments on any reviews.
 
prlwctd's Questions
 
prlwctd has not submitted any questions.
 
prlwctd's Answers
 
prlwctd has not submitted any answers.