Share Real3DFan's profile
Real3DFan
Real3DFan's stats
- Review count2
- Helpfulness votes1
- First reviewJanuary 10, 2012
- Last reviewFebruary 16, 2012
- Featured reviews0
- Average rating2.5
Reviews comments
- Review comment count0
- Helpfulness votes0
- First review commentNone
- Last review commentNone
- Featured review comments0
Questions
- Question count0
- Helpfulness votes0
- First questionNone
- Last questionNone
- Featured questions0
Answers
- Answer count0
- Helpfulness votes0
- First answerNone
- Last answerNone
- Featured answers0
- Best answers0
Real3DFan's Reviews
![G-Force 3D [3 Discs] [3D] [Blu-ray/DVD] [Blu-ray/Blu-ray 3D/DVD] [2009]](https://pisces.bbystatic.com/image2/BestBuy_US/images/products/3648/3648323_sa.jpg)
Posted by: Real3DFan
from Texas
Being a 3D addict, when I saw the box, I grabbed it before reading it carefully. I was under the impression that it was a third in a series (such as was the case with Jaws 3-D which was a new story). We'd already seen G-Force. Good movie, but the 3D is not worth buying another copy to get it.
I don't appreciate companies that re-process older movies into 3D and expect us to fork over $30+ for it. I have an LG 3DTV which has software built into it which processes 2D into 3D almost as good as the studios do. Granted, it's not exactly as perfected as the studio work, but it is still only processed. It is simply impossible (because of the nature of 3D) to get an accurate 3D view without having two separate lenses capturing two separate views of a scene.
Processing 2D to 3D simply places objects in various positions in Z-space when they overlap. It does that by offsetting the object in the X direction (side to side). However, when you see a person in real life, for example, looking at them face to face your right eye observes more of the person's left side than what your left eye sees...and vice versa. Your brain needs these two different images to process the 3D. When via a computer you process 2D to 3D it's the same exact image only put in different locations to simulate depth. The result is that you feel like you are looking at cardboard cutouts rather than real objects or people.
THAT'S why I gave this particular video a 2. And THAT's why I will not buy Star Wars when it is processed into 3D. Unless you completely re-shoot it, it's not any better than what my TV can do.
What's great about it: Story
What's not so great: 3D
No, I would not recommend this to a friend.
Share this review:
-4points
1of 6voted this as helpful.
![Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Part 1 [3D] [Blu-ray] [Blu-ray/Blu-ray 3D] [2010]](https://pisces.bbystatic.com/image2/BestBuy_US/images/products/3728/3728037_sa.jpg)
Customer Rating
3
Fine story, acting lacking, bad editing, 3D wasted
on January 10, 2012
Posted by: Real3DFan
from Texas
The editing was the worst of all the films. Not enough deleted scenes. It was obvious that they were trying to stretch half a book into a full movie. The dancing scene in the tent for example...a waste of time. The 3D was an afterthought. My LG TV does a better job of processing 2D to 3D. It convinced me not to buy the first 6 films when they are released in 3D. There is simply no substitute for actually shooting with a 3D camera (2 lenses). The only part that was an improvement on the book was giving Hedwig, the owl a more meaningful death.
What's great about it: Story
What's not so great: directing and editing
No, I would not recommend this to a friend.
Share this review:
-1point
0of 1voted this as helpful.
Real3DFan's Review Comments
Real3DFan has not submitted comments on any reviews.
Real3DFan's Questions
Real3DFan has not submitted any questions.
Real3DFan's Answers
Real3DFan has not submitted any answers.