As a fan of Donnie Darko, I was very excited when I heard this movie was being made. The first movie was a masterpiece of storytelling, starring an extremely capable cast and featuring the wonderful script, rich characters, and fantastic direction of Richard Kelly. Donnie Darko, whether you particularly enjoyed it or not, was a quality film.
S.Darko, on the other hand, is NOT a quality film.
The casting of Daveigh Chase in her reprisal role of Samantha Darko serves as the only bright spot in this film. However, while the audience feels pity for the now 17 year-old Samantha, I believe any emotional connection the audience has with the character is more a product of our introduction to Samantha as a 10-year-old in the first Darko film.
Besides Daveigh Chase's nearly-charming performance, the acting is awkward and forced at best, though it's abundantly clear the actors didn't have much to work with. Nathan Atkin's screenplay is vacuous and kludgey. It actually becomes noticeable when the film stumbles upon a natural-feeling exchange of dialog. And I don't even know where or how to begin to address the inconsistencies and ignorant/adolescent/bizarre exploitation of stereotypes. The prevalence of embarrassingly hokey characters renders the landscape nearly cartoonish in nature.
And perhaps the film's troubles are exacerbated by the deficiencies of the director. Chris Fisher and his editing, effects, and cinematography teams are probably most responsible for the half-assed, low-budget feel that runs all through the presentation. The best way I can describe it is that it just plays like a bad made-for-TV special or a mediocre college A/V assignment.
And the music... oh the music. I think we can all agree that a good score or soundtrack with thoughtful song choices in the hands of someone with good instincts concerning when to use what, can add so much to the mood of a film. But yet again, this film fails. Now, I admit that a good soundtrack/score could NOT have saved this film, but it would've helped ease the pain in certain areas rather than contribute to the overwhelming awkwardness, and may have helped the audience take certain scenes more seriously. Even a very simple piano score akin to Michael Andrews' work on the first Darko film would've done wonders to influence the tone.
In conclusion, I strongly feel that this film, at least THIS film shot with this script, by this group of filmmakers, should never have been made. Even watching the special features, it’s obvious that there wasn't much conviction behind the project. The producers, director, and screenwriter all rebel against the "sequel" label and maybe they're absolutely right. The admission of the screenwriter is most telling. At one point he refers to the film as an "homage" to Richard Kelly's Donnie Darko. Well, if I may quote critic Matt Zoller Seitz… "Homage without innovation isn't homage; it's karaoke." And not only isn't there any innovation, S.Darko isn’t even a quality remake or rip-off.
If S.Darko is karaoke, it's BAD karaoke.
What's great about it: Daveigh Chase
What's not so great: Everything else. (script, acting, direction, cinematography, effects, editng)