The new Jango Fett Starship set is one of the best entries in the UCS line up. Taking fame from the classic 2015 UCS Slave 1, this set does it better.
I have both. I was a little hesitant to buy this set at first, but pulled the trigger on 4/30. I'm sure I was one of the first to purchase it.
The build experience is fluid. Took me about 8 hours. The booklet offers a lot of insight into how the Slave 1 came to be. Nice to see more Attack of the Clones in Lego.
The size is about the same as the 2015 version, but with a little less than 1,000 more parts, you feel it in the weight. The model is solid, structurally sound, and generally wont fall apart.
The stickers and Young Boba are a contention for most fans. Boba is a bad minifigure, straight up. Jango on the other hand has immaculate arm printing. The stickers are also not an issue. I lined mine up with edges and fixed most of the issue.
Worth buying.
I would recommend this to a friend!
Written by a customer while visiting LEGO
Customer Rating
3
Assembling
on May 7, 2025
Posted by: Fabrizio
Verified Purchase:No
The set is amazing and I dont have that many complaints besides the fact that the green pieces on the side keep coming off easily for some odd reason. Some people advised me to press it hard and i have done and nothing seems to work. At this point I don’t know if I’m the only experiencing that or people have pointed out. So Im at the point to either dissemble completely and finish it like that. I have even contemplated the idea of using crazy glue. i did forget to mentioned that Im frustrated….Also i do feel that it should have not been sticker rather that blocks that were printed. I would lean more towards the printed pieces instead.
This is VERY fragile, mostly the ship's facade. The panels extending to the rear of the tail are floppy. So many small interconnections in the middle come apart easily with light handling. The stand is convenient. This would be better with a rock-solid technic frame instead of the ton of small SNOT connections.
I recently encountered rumors that the Slave I was receiving an Ultimate Collector’s Edition, and as someone whose childhood was deeply shaped by this iconic ship—through the films, video games, and toys—I was filled with excitement. Naturally, you can imagine my profound disappointment upon purchasing the product, only to find it labeled as “Jango Fett’s Starship.” What a disheartening oversight.
While I recognize that LEGO is not entirely at fault, this instance reflects a growing pattern of inaccuracies and rebranding decisions that diminish both the emotional resonance and perceived value of these products. For many consumers, especially long-standing fans, such inconsistencies erode the justification needed to make these substantial purchases. LEGO, a company once renowned for its attention to detail and celebration of source material, seems to be faltering in its commitment to authenticity.
This experience left me disillusioned—not merely by a toy or a label, but by a world increasingly shaped by corporate caution, revisionism, and a disregard for the cultural artifacts that once inspired awe. I hold out hope that one day, balance will be restored to the creative hierarchies that now appear corrupted by commercialism and a covetous pursuit of market appeasement. Until then, I remain a disappointed, if not disheartened, admirer of a fading legacy.
This is a long overdue set, plagued by 4 major problems. Name of set-Use of stickers-Jango’s blasters-Boba’s hair piece. We will start with the name of the set. This is Jango Fett’s Slave 1. Though it may be more of Disney’s fault for this discrepancy, i’m still going to bring it up. The next problem is the use of stickers. In a set like this, everything should be prints. Stickers make it look cheap and tacky. There’s plenty of competition out there using strictly prints (and a lot of them). The next issue is Jango’s blasters. I wish a new mold was made for his blasters, as these specific pieces were used as accessories that you’d tie a string through in Lego City fire sets back in the day if i’m remembering correctly. One of the final issues I have with the set is Boba’s hair piece. To keep things short and sweet, the original hair piece is far superior. Other than these issues, it’s a nice set that is long overdue.
First time building such a big set and I enjoyed every minute of it.
I would recommend this to a friend!
Written by a customer while visiting LEGO
Customer Rating
5
Perfect Set (with a few caveats)
on June 1, 2025
Posted by: Brody
Verified Purchase:No
Insanely accurate depiction of the ship from Attack of the Clones, incredibly sturdy, and features that go beyond what would've been expected in a UCS set. However, despite the build quality, it did contain far too many stickers for my liking, with some even having inaccurate coloration relative to the other bricks in the build (i.e., the canopy stickers.) The Boba Fett mini figure is also low quality in the set, lacking his signature boots & having a questionable hair piece. Otherwise, the set itself is beyond amazing & is easily one of LEGO's best Star Wars sets to date.
For a set that is advertised as an adult set, the set needs to be movie accurate. The boba fett minifugre hairpiece is quite awful and the legs need to be dual molded to resemble boots. Also, for the price of the set, stop using sticker pieces and make them all printed.