Customer reviews from usa.canon.com
Canon - EOS R1 Mirrorless Camera (Body Only) - Black
Average customer rating
4
(13 Reviews)
Rating breakdown 13 reviews
5 Stars
9
4 Stars
0
3 Stars
1
2 Stars
1
1 Star
2
78%of customers recommend this product.
(
7 out of
9)
Customer Reviews for Canon - EOS R1 Mirrorless Camera (Body Only) - Black
Customer Rating
5
Simply THE best
on February 28, 2025
Posted by: EvilTed
Anyone who complains about the 24MP is an idiot and doesn't shoot sports professionally.
They also need to learn to frame the image using the view finder and not rely on cropping.
24 MP is more than enough.
The R1 is the Canon equivalent of the Sony A9 III.
The R5 II is the equivalent of the Sony A1 II - just $2000 cheaper.
They also need to learn to frame the image using the view finder and not rely on cropping.
24 MP is more than enough.
The R1 is the Canon equivalent of the Sony A9 III.
The R5 II is the equivalent of the Sony A1 II - just $2000 cheaper.
I own an R1 and R3.
I also own an R5 II and a R5.
I also own an R5 II and a R5.
The R1 solves most of the issues I have with the R3, like having dual CFX B card slots.
Adding better AF, pre-capture, a bigger, brighter EVF, 40 FPS and to me it was worth the loss selling an R3.
The same with the R5 II vs. the R.
Adding better AF, pre-capture, a bigger, brighter EVF, 40 FPS and to me it was worth the loss selling an R3.
The same with the R5 II vs. the R.
The question is, if I were to trade up again, would it be for a second R1 or a second R5 II?
It would be for a second R1 :)
It would be for a second R1 :)
Written by a customer while visiting usa.canon.com
Customer Rating
2
Still small mega pixel images.
on July 17, 2024
Posted by: Kenny alan
I hoped this camera would be higher than the R5 which I own which has 45 mp images. I prayed that this Amazing camera would at least be 65 mp. Nope! It’s just a 24 mp…. Why ? Why? Why? Fuljifilm has 104 mp cameras and Sony had 65 mp cameras and Canon does not.
Written by a customer while visiting usa.canon.com
Customer Rating
5
If you need more RESOLUTION .. the R5 or the R5 Mark II is for you..
on July 17, 2024
Posted by: CanonR8isbestofall
Great Camera..
Much better than expected...
Excellent Sports . People/portrait, and LARGE wildlife camera..
Much better than expected...
Excellent Sports . People/portrait, and LARGE wildlife camera..
The R5 Mark II is a better at capturing small/tiny wildlife and then cropping..
I would recommend this to a friend!
Written by a customer while visiting usa.canon.com
Customer Rating
1
Disappointing
on July 17, 2024
Posted by: Satyam
Very low resolution in this camera.........................................
Written by a customer while visiting usa.canon.com
Customer Rating
1
disappointed in resolution
on July 17, 2024
Posted by: canonrumors
from New York
I wanted to pre-order this, but I could not. This is just a slight hardware bump over the R3, sure the autofocus will be great but without a higher resolution picture, it will produce the same images that the R3 makes. Save your money and wait for a version that has more megapixels.
No, I would not recommend this to a friend.
Written by a customer while visiting usa.canon.com