Good product, fast response. The only surprise is the sample aren't submitted with any context of measure. So how can you make the difference from at reset and under exercise, ...? The answer are very "by the book" and oriented at teaching. Which isn't bad but would expect more specific response based on more specific details about measurements vs context of use. No feedback asking for a different measurement set based on a different context of use and no feedback is given on expected next measurement context or frequency acting as a follow-up like someone would actually care for us.
I really enjoy getting my report every month, knowing it has been reviewed by a cardiologist gives me confidence. I can send ecg's to my Doctor if I am having issues.
I had a review on my husbands EKG which was listed as "unclassified". When the "cardiologist" read it, he said "Normal sinus rhythm with a secondary as wide QRS. This Diagnosis is supposed to be read as one of the six that is included in Kardia Care.