Customer Reviews for Samsung - NX1000 20.3-Megapixel Digital Compact System Camera - Pink
Customer Rating
5
Alot of features
on September 10, 2013
Posted by: Durfkin15
from Baltimore, MD
I have had this camera for about a month and I have not went through all the features. It seems like everyday I discover something else I can do. I have not had any problems so far.
Pros: Lightweight
I would recommend this to a friend!
Features
5
Performance
5
Design
5
Value
5
Written by a customer while visiting Samsung US
Customer Rating
5
My first interchangable lens
on April 12, 2013
Posted by: tytanboys
from Fargo, ND
The NX1000 has been GREAT! I wanted to upgrade my camera experience from the point and shoot to something more versatile but I didn't want the expense or bulkiness of the professional cameras. The lenses are easy to swap and I find that are hardly ever need a flash so not having one built-in is no big deal. The picture quality is great and I'm still learning but the action shots I get with my kid's activities are really good. One issue I have had is that switching the mode using the dial can sometimes not switch correctly. I think it was that I switched it too much and the camera couldn't figure out how to get back to where I was. I would recommend that the Samsung MobileLink app be updated to support all mobile devices.
I am a serious amateur photographer who normally uses a Canon DSLR. I was attracted to the NX1000 because it has professional features like a 20 MP sensor that allows shooting at low light. It has proven to be an excellent "street camera." Many features appeal to me but the panoramic capability is one of the best. It did not take long to adjust to using the back of the camera to compose and focus instead of an optical viewfinder. Picture quality is superb. Ease of use is important with a new camera and this one excels. The 16 mm wide angle lens is just right for the kind of shots I often take. My next purchase is the 50-200 mm tele lens. Overall, it is a heck of a buy.
I bought this camera some time ago. I have always been interested in photography but I didn't want to spend too much in a camera since I'm a beginner. I started looking over the web to try to find a good camera with a nice quality/performance/price relation. Coincidentally, this camera appeared in one of the pages where I use to buy my stuff. So I decided to give it a chance, the price was excellent and after reading a couple of reviews online the camera looked powerful enough to start learning. After some months of use, I can say that I'm really satisfied with this camera, it's my companion to every family reunion and trip around my city. It has a nice performance, the only thing that I would recommend is getting another extra battery if you're planning long photo sessions and maybe buying a 200 mm lens that is sold separately and I have missed a couple of times.
Pros: Inexpensive, Lightweight, easy to use
Cons: not so much battery life
I would recommend this to a friend!
Features
4
Performance
4
Design
5
Value
5
Written by a customer while visiting Samsung US
Customer Rating
5
This camera is by far , the best camera that I ever have .
on August 12, 2014
Posted by: jpech375
from weymouth ma
Expertise:Intermediate
I never expect the camera to be able to take picture with all the effects that you can get in the photo shop software . I'm very impress with the size and the capacity .
compared to another professional cams this cam size is perfect. i use to take it with me everywhere in less than 1 week i took via this cam 2000 pic! The photos take well number of like mainly for their high definition snap. even at night the flash makes a great job.
I purchased this for my wife as she likes to have the latest and greatest, She has a point and shoot and a DSLR. This has now taken both their place and she only uses this camera now. Best purchase I have made so far for her in terms of Cameras.
Pros: Bright display, Inexpensive, Lightweight, love the wifi, love remote viewfinder
Cons: would like some features from the galaxy camera, frimware upgrades should be simpler