Customer reviews from sony.com
Sony - DSLR SAL-1650 16-50MM F2.8 DT Ssm Alpha Camera Lens - Black
Average customer rating
4.5
(10 Reviews)
Rating breakdown 10 reviews
5 Stars
8
4 Stars
1
3 Stars
0
2 Stars
0
1 Star
1
90%of customers recommend this product.
(
9 out of
10)
Customer Reviews for Sony - DSLR SAL-1650 16-50MM F2.8 DT Ssm Alpha Camera Lens - Black
Customer Rating
5
The best crop sensor general purpose zoom
on May 26, 2017
Posted by: jaffreywali
Gender:Male
For many the choice boils down to this or the Zeiss 1680. I have been using a Zeiss 1680 first on an A300 and then A77 for the past 5-6 years. While the Zeiss has excellent image quality, a couple of things bothered me. First was the lens creep and second was the relative small aperture. I have been using the Sony 16-50 for the last few weeks on my A77 and my impressions are:
1. The overall image quality in terms of sharpness, color and distortion are identical to the Zeiss, with a slight edge to the Sony. The Sony performs much better in low or more challenging lighting situations.
2. The build quality of the Sony actually seems a shade higher than the Zeiss in all aspects.
3. The ability to lock the zoom is a nice feature.
4. I do miss the extra 30mm of reach. Doesn't seem like a big deal, but once you're used to the reach even missing 30mm is inconvenient.
5. The Sony focuses faster and more silently. Again, I thought this would not be a big deal for me, but it makes a difference (in favor of the Sony).
2. The build quality of the Sony actually seems a shade higher than the Zeiss in all aspects.
3. The ability to lock the zoom is a nice feature.
4. I do miss the extra 30mm of reach. Doesn't seem like a big deal, but once you're used to the reach even missing 30mm is inconvenient.
5. The Sony focuses faster and more silently. Again, I thought this would not be a big deal for me, but it makes a difference (in favor of the Sony).
Overall, I prefer the 16-50 to the 16-80 Zeiss. Clearly, Sony limited the reach to make space for the more expensive 16-80 which the Sony outperforms in every respect. Here is a photo comparing the relative sizes of the Zeiss and Sony.
I would recommend this to a friend!
Written by a customer while visiting sony.com
Posted by: Jcbett
Gender:Male
Verified Purchase:Yes
Bought this in a package with A77II. I would have ordered this one anyway. Good Sharp and Bright Color. Enjoy in Low Light.
I would recommend this to a friend!
Written by a customer while visiting sony.com
Customer Rating
5
Great lens
on April 15, 2019
Posted by: Anonymous
Gender:Male
The Sony 16-50 2.8 for the money really is a great lens, very sharp and fast.
I would recommend this to a friend!
Written by a customer while visiting sony.com
Customer Rating
5
simply the best lens for your Sony alpha APS-C
on December 15, 2011
Posted by: TechnoGuy
This is a beautiful (albeit not light or cheap) partner for the Sony Alphas, esp. the new A77 and A65. It might be the sharpest of any 16-50 2.8 on the market right now, and it is even sharper than the very pricey alpha mount Carl Zeiss 16-80mm, but of course without the reach at the telephoto end (but balancing that, it is significantly faster). After surfing through many dozens of lens reviews at the phenomenal ImagingResource.com collection of lens tests, not only is this the sharpest 3X zoom range lens for Sony alpha cameras, it right now is the sharpest 16-50 2.8 lens available on any DSLR, full frame or APS-C, for any manufacturer.
It is not an overstatement to suggest that this might be one of if not the finest general purpose lens that anyone has ever made for a digital camera. If you're skeptical of such a claim (and certainly I would be skeptical myself of such a claim without proof), take a close look at the dozens and dozens of lens tests at imaging resource. No zoom lenses even comes close, and it beats many prime lenses (yes, including the prime lenses of those highly touted competitors Canon and Nikon). Given that Sony Alpha 65/77 firmware now corrects all the classic optical distortions (chromatic aberration, vignetting and barrel/pincushion) for lenses that the new firmware has corrective algorithms for (and this includes many of the popular lenses sold by Sony including this one), this lens becomes perhaps the best optical value in digital photography. Again I know that sounds like a grandiose claim, but please, if you're skeptical, look at the testing. This lens is simply a technical tour de force in photographic optics.
Pros:
1) sharpest zoom lens of any kind in the Sony alpha A-mount group - in fact, it is sharper than several of the Sony prime lenses at its best apertures (f4-f5). Sharpest lens of its kind right now for any digital camera.
2) Not bad CA, distortion and vignetting, and close to zero in those problem areas with the A65/A77 firmware corrections.
3) Fast focusing
4) Decent range (3.5X) that covers about 85% of what most people shoot. Perfect for portraits and decent wide angle for landscapes/scenery.
5) Fast - even minimally stopped down to f4 (where it is sharpest), it is faster than many other zooms are wide open (and WAY sharper).
6) Great value when priced against the Nikon/Canon competition (cheaper than any of their glass of even close to this quality).
2) Not bad CA, distortion and vignetting, and close to zero in those problem areas with the A65/A77 firmware corrections.
3) Fast focusing
4) Decent range (3.5X) that covers about 85% of what most people shoot. Perfect for portraits and decent wide angle for landscapes/scenery.
5) Fast - even minimally stopped down to f4 (where it is sharpest), it is faster than many other zooms are wide open (and WAY sharper).
6) Great value when priced against the Nikon/Canon competition (cheaper than any of their glass of even close to this quality).
Cons:
1) Big and heavy (that's what to you have to concede to get a constant aperture 2.8 zoom lens)
2) Not cheap compared to the standard kit lens (a decent 15-55mm option but not nearly as fast or as sharp)
3) Can't be bought with the Alpha 65 as its kit lens (why does Sony do that?)
4) Wish it just went to 65mm.
2) Not cheap compared to the standard kit lens (a decent 15-55mm option but not nearly as fast or as sharp)
3) Can't be bought with the Alpha 65 as its kit lens (why does Sony do that?)
4) Wish it just went to 65mm.
Overall, this is a killer deal - given that it is as sharp as many prime lens - it offers a no-compromise option for the highest quality images your Sony SLT/DSLR can generate, without having to carry more than two lens - this and a telephoto. Highly, highly recommended.
What's great about it: 1) exceptional sharpness; 2) great value; 3) firmware correction
What's not so great: 1) weight; 2) somewhat stiff zoom ring; 3) not cheap
I would recommend this to a friend!
Written by a customer while visiting sony.com
Customer Rating
5
Killer Lens
on September 18, 2012
Posted by: TheEnthusiast
I have two G lenses and two Zeiss lenses, and, subjectively, this lens is sharper. It is a perfect match to the A77, which needs the large aperture and super-sharp optical performance. When I bought the A77, I worried that the detectors (pixels) were so tiny and that a lens would have a tough job being sharp enough to take advantage of the sensor resolution. The A77 performance with this lens wildly exceeds even my wildest hopes! I recently took a shot across a wide bay with this lens on the A77. Later I blew it up on a big monitor and zoomed in to see how much detail was there. There was a diagonal white line representing a roof. The line was a perfect stair-step series of white pixels on a dark background. This was a RAW file. There was no visible spillover: just white pixels. I was astonished.
I've seen no problems with chromatic aberration. Colors are strikingly vibrant. Contrast is superb. Also note that it is sealed and less vulnerable to internal dust than most lenses.
A lens like this with F/2.8 across the full zoom range is almost too good to be true. The only imperfection that I've been able to find is some geometric (barrel-like) distortion that is primarily near the center of the image. The A77 completely removes this automatically for jpeg output. You only see it when you shoot jpeg and RAW and compare them. I didn't list it as a con because the A77 cleans it up with no loss of resolution. My only complaint is that there is no way to output a corrected image in a lossless format, which is a complaint on the camera, not the lens. I get around this by running RAW images through DxO software.
Bottom line: if you're buying an A77, you have to buy this lens. If my only Sony camera were the A77, and I could only have one lens, this would be it, REGARDLESS OF PRICE. I'm about to sell my A77 to buy an A99. My one regret is that I can't keep this lens. I believe that for pure optical performance, the A77 with this lens is as good or better than a full-frame camera with the Zeiss f/2.8 24-70mm; and that is a state-of-the-art combination. If you're considering buying just the A77 body and a cheaper lens, take my advice and don't even think about it. This lens will be a sound investment if you take care of it. And money is among our few renewable resources.
What's great about it: Razor sharp; fast, silent focusing; great price
What's not so great: None
I would recommend this to a friend!
Written by a customer while visiting sony.com
Customer Rating
5
The SONY 16-50MM 2.8 lens is excellent
on January 7, 2012
Posted by: ABETTERDJ
We've had our SONY 16-50MM 2.8 lens since the beginning of October. We are sooo happy that we bought ours as part of the 2nd SONY SLT-A77 we ordered as a kit.
This lens is our main lens in our wedding photography and concert photography business. We've now taken over 20,000 excellent photos with it. This lens goes with the SONY SLT-A77 like peanut butter and jelly!
When it arrived it was our intention to put it in a head to head test against the MINOLTA 17-35MM 2.8-4 lens that my wife loved so much and sell the loser. When the 2nd shot with the 16-50 appeared on the LCD screen I went back inside the house and prepared my wife to say goodbye to her favorite lens as no head to head test was needed.
We were the official photographers on the Rock Legends Cruise in December and I was a little concerned that she wouldn't be able to zoom in close enough because the stage for one of the venues was a good 30' from front row. The crops were excellent so I'll never have to worry about her distance shots again!
his lens could have easily been labeled a "G" lens and sold for $1000 more and nobody would have complained.
his lens could have easily been labeled a "G" lens and sold for $1000 more and nobody would have complained.
We have lots of photos posted and an in depth review under the SONY|MINOLTA tab on our site. http://www.abetterdj.net
What's great about it: very fast, bright, excellent color, great in low light
I would recommend this to a friend!
Written by a customer while visiting sony.com
Customer Rating
5
Awesome Lens
on April 20, 2013
Posted by: FotoJunkie
Cant complain with this lens. I use mine with a a77, a65, and a300
What's great about it: Great all around lens
I would recommend this to a friend!
Written by a customer while visiting sony.com
Customer Rating
4
Good , However...
on May 22, 2012
Posted by: OldNoob
One Month experience with this SAL1650 lens on both the a580 and a100
There are a lot of 5 star reviews on this page for the lens. I guess it is justified if you compare this lens to the other low to mid range zooms Sony produces. As a Zoom lens it is very very good especially at f/9 to f/11.
However from 16mm to 24mm at f/2.8 it is a soft, but then again, we have to remember it is not a wide angle prime but rather a zoom lens.
At 50mm f/10 the lens is very sharp, in fact i would say it is as sharp as my old Minolta 50mm prime.
There are a lot of 5 star reviews on this page for the lens. I guess it is justified if you compare this lens to the other low to mid range zooms Sony produces. As a Zoom lens it is very very good especially at f/9 to f/11.
However from 16mm to 24mm at f/2.8 it is a soft, but then again, we have to remember it is not a wide angle prime but rather a zoom lens.
At 50mm f/10 the lens is very sharp, in fact i would say it is as sharp as my old Minolta 50mm prime.
What's great about it: it is FAST! and very Sharp at 50mm f/10
What's not so great: at 16mm it is soft
I would recommend this to a friend!
Written by a customer while visiting sony.com