Customer Reviews for Stilletto - REVOLVER 36MP 360 Degree CELLULAR TRAIL CAMERA
Customer Rating
1
Blanks and butts
on July 14, 2025
Posted by: Steven-m
Had mine in a food plot for 3 nights now, and took around 150 pictures, about half of which are blanks, and a lot of the pictures that have deer it has just their butt. There's another camera set up beside it and while there's deer eating minerals for 5 minutes, this camera only sends a couple blanks. It's a good idea but it certainly doesn't work!
Blurry pics and wasted pics. I didn’t get one pic of any animal but a bird. In 2 days I hit my limit of 600 pics and didn’t have anything to save to my photos. I have 3 of another brand and they work 10x better than the stealth. I just wanted to try this out for the landscape it would cover. Would be one thing if it actually took good pictures and everything wasn’t blurry. I bet if we only got charged by the quality of the pics you would fix that issue.
I won this camera about a year ago in a gun draw. Loved it, had some issues with fog in the lenses but they rectified this issue sending a new one with warranty and haven’t had the issue since, believe it was a slight gasket issue around camera 5 . For referenced used in western Quebec whitetail/moose country with negative temperatures during our seasons
This is my second stealth camera. I really like the 360 the only trouble I had was trying to get it to not take pictures of the post. It was on right behind it. I never figured that out yet, but I’m working on it but other than that, it takes great pictures. It took a little while to figure out. You know it’s all six at one time not six different pictures well, it is but it’s not but I figured it out and it’s a very good camera. I like it very much.
Have had great success with these cameras! I currently have 4 and have captured great pictures and videos with them that I would not have with a regular 45 degree view. I captured a nice buck rubbing a tree this past year with one of my cameras.
Overall a good experience. Getting full-circle coverage from a single device is cost-effective. Claiming to produce 32MP photos is false advertising! The imaging sensor appears to be 4MP and if configured for 8, 16, or 32MP photos, it is upscaled by software, producing very pixelated/blurry photos wasting significantly more disk space. In Montana, my camera sometimes fogs up, but not too often. My main frustration is that HD Videos will not download reliably from the camera.