Customer Reviews for Brother - INKvestment 4555 Wireless Color All-in-One Inkjet Printer with 2 Paper Trays (MFCJ4555DW), Great for Small Offices - White
Customer Rating
5
Great for small business
on December 4, 2025
Posted by: tonyv10_8799
[This review was collected as part of a promotion.] This is the perfect printer for a small business or even just personal use. Heavy duty and easy to set up. You can connect and print through ether et, USB or wirelessly. It includes colored ink and black ink and the page yield is a lot. So far I haven't had any problems and everything works great. It's not much louder then my regular printer.
Written by a customer while visiting influenster.com
Customer Rating
4
Good printer but with some flaws
on February 18, 2026
Posted by: Alexey
from San Jose, CA
Wow, 9 reviews and all from folks who have received this printer for free in exchange for a review. I'll add mine, not so glowing - but hey, at least I paid for this machine out of my own pocket.
Overall, not a bad machine with a few issues. Bought it to replace an older HP OfficeJet 8610, so obviously comparing to the previous model I had.
The good: - Decent print speed, good colors, fairly quiet. - Supports a variety of networking protocols, including CIFS (aka "Windows shared folder"), FTP, SFTP - which is perfect for a home office. - Compact, just barely larger than the 8x11 scanner flat bed. - Native Linux scanning support at high-resolution (HP was limiting Linux scanning support at 600dpi).
Not so good: - The node name (i.e. the name you see this device on your local network) cannot be changed. There is a box in the settings for this, but once you save the new node name, it reverts back to the default value "BRNxxxxxxxxxxxx" (with "xxx" being printer's MAC address) after a few seconds. Tried setting it via the printer's panel, via the web UI, and via the WIndows app (BRadmin Professional). Not a big deal, but if you have more than printer, you'd need to remember which MAC address each of them has. - The compression for built-in JPEG scan is horrible: the resulting picture has visible compression artifacts (squares of about 8x8 pixels). Scanning as a raw image to the computer does not produce such visible artifacts. - The ADF for the scanner is really small, I wouldn't load more than ~8 pages at a time. It also has a weird construction where the scanned pages are going on top of the pages yet to be scanned. You don't see how many pages remain to be scanned, and it looks as if ADF might pull the page it just scanned back into the ADF (though it hasn't happened yet).
As a side note, support could be better informed about product features. I asked a question on this page about scanning to network, and received incorrect response from Brother support team. Fortunately, before that I have reached to a different response via chat (which turned out to be correct), and confirmed myself that scanning to network folder is supported.
Written by a customer while visiting brother-usa.com