Driver will not install to my windows 11 laptop. I spent hours working at it with no success . Canon Website shows that others have had the same problem but Canon offers no solution. so I’m sending back. Darn, I really wanted this to work.
We replaced a 600F with this 400. The scanner is more awkward to use, but acceptable. The IJ Scan Utility though is far inferior to the earlier CanoScan Toolbox 5.0. In the Toolbox all the settings I change regularly, mode, scan type and output file name are on one pop-up, not on a layer below. Also, I should have total control over the output file name. I should not have to remove date/sequence nbr every time I scan something. Both the hardware and software are a step backwards. If Canon had Windows 11 drivers for the 600F we would still be using a perfectly operating scanner and a well thought out interface.
I've gotten two scanners and both were defective. The hardware was installed backwards. They are sending out a third scanner in an attempt to get one that works. Hopefully the third times the charm, or it's 3 strikes and they're out!
This is my first time using a scanner and I couldn't be happier. It was easy to set up, the program works well, the scans are fast, and the quality is wonderful. I'm scanning old photos and documents for family history and this is just what I needed.
It's okay - maybe expectations too high for this price point.
on June 13, 2022
Posted by: FituserID2rules
from Northern CA
Verified Purchase:Yes
Instructions aren't clear on how to obtain the maximum resolution that this scanner is supposed to support. Included software for "stitching" scan was disappointing. It only works to combine two images side by side you apparently can't combine top and bottom (like to scan a legal document - hello). Granted I can scan most legal documents in my other sheet feeder scanner but I was hoping to use this flatbed for some old and really fragile items. Noisy even on "quiet" setting but seems to work fine.
This is a solid scanner with good scan quality, though not much different than my LIDE 220 that's six years old. I bought this one because my Mac Studio wouldn't recognize the LIDE 220, and I wanted a scanner that used USB-C. This one does. However, it has one irritating quirk: it will regularly "wake up" and run for a few seconds. You can hear the scan head moving back and forth. This happens multiple times throughout my day when I'm not even using the computer it's connected to. It got to be so irritating I've now unplugged it and will only plug it back in when I need to use it. My old scanner never did this, so I'm not sure what's going on. But overall I'm happy with this scanner other than that one issue.