Customer Reviews for Staples - 8.5" x 14" Multipurpose Paper, 20 lbs., 96 Brightness, 500 Sheets/Ream, 1 Reams/Carton - White
Customer Rating
1
Rebate denial
on March 21, 2014
Posted by: Paula K.
After buying this within the appropriate timeframe my rebate was denied citing it wasn't bought in time. Indeed it was. No response to multiple requests for remedy.
Staples Multipurpose paper is the best paper that I have been using for a couple of years now. I run a business and because of this I prefer to use the brighter white paper. I use this paper in three different printing machines. I use it in a color laser monochrome laser and an All-in-One Inkjet printers. I don't have any jamming problems with the paper in any of my printing machines the colors are vibrant and look good. I would recommend this paper to anyone who is looking for a good multipurpose paper. I have also found that this paper also tends to most of the time cost less then paper prices at Office Depot & Walmart of the same type of paper.
The Staples Multipurpose paper is a good quality paper. I am presently doing research and preparing a family history going back to the 1800's. This requires many copies of different newspaper clipping picture and any other information I am able to locate. After collecting this information I can re-arrange pictures with news paper items. Sometimes this take additional times as I always find another article that should have been included with the first copies I have made. So I just start again with a new page using the Staples Multipurpose paper.
Problem free printing paper. I have used some other generic paper for printing and they would feed to much paper. This one works great and is a good deal for the cost.
I original wanted to reorder the multipurpose paper pack for inkjet and copiers. But I ordered this one by mistake as I got confused online by these paper items single pack or multiple pack. I was slightly disappointed to find that the paper is thinner than the other one but turns out my printer prints quite sharp on this paper so I accepted my mistake.